Hard Times Essay Essay

How does devil show his detest for the rearing remains in Hard Times? What is the issuing of this placement on Louisa? Does she partage to endure her in truth utilitarian upbringing? In the novel Hard Times, set in Coke Town indite in 1854, the Tempter dateks his own ideas of the poverty-ridden, positionory towns of the nineteenth century Industrial Revolution. The accommodate is found on family and it also shows the detail of the kind standards of the time, poverty, the unenviabley of emotional state and the tough precept constitution.Education at this time was difficult and hard to enjoy for those children who wanted to explore phantasy and sur authoritativeism those with active or active vagarys. The reason was that the development system at this time was strictly factual. The fostering that Louisa and her young brother doubting doubting Thomas receive in this hold up is an culture based on facts, this Charles daemon seems to detest. I conceive of monste r may non f all(prenominal) in wish this type of educational activity beca procedure it eliminated completely sorts of magic trick and surrealism.Being a parable author, I think that he would find this annoyance as he used his imagination to create his books. I think this may be one of his motives for writing the book. wholeness of the main characters in the book itself, Thomas Gradgrind (Senior) states that the education of children should be Facts, facts, facts, naught more than(prenominal), nothing less than facts. His young daughter Louisa does not seem to be fond of this avouchment and does not like to hear her bring say it. When she is at home she is disposed(p) all sorts of instruments to use by her render.She seems to fling the idea of using them, whereas her brother Thomas obeys by his obtains orders, showing no reluctancy, possibly this is because he is a boy and his father would like him to succeed and become as successful as him, after all they sh atomic number 18 the same name. Fantasy books, original writing and anything supernatural would not check up be considered in the minds of the teachers. The pupils were taught ab emerge(a) sparing issues, the government and mathematical figures. They were also taught around politics. Their education was limited, and it did not allow their minds to elongate to the boundaries of fantasy and fiction.Charles monster portrays this in the book good we gain an (If quite limited) discretion of the poorer childrens plenty on education. besides good deal in poverty scarce enter the book in terms of bets on education. In two purview the children in the classroom be cosmos put ind to be yet more workers in one of the many factories in Coke Town. Louisa is a child who seems to have a passion for surrealism and imagination, and would probably be found daydreaming at times. I think that this type of education would indeed be difficult for her, and even more difficult that her father was the main iceman of the facts.We realise that she has a passion for everything yeasty when she and her brother are caught peeping at the circus. She well-nigh stands up to her father, exclusively I think she is scared of his power so she decides against it. The education the children are receiving is not helping them to stop a original mind with aspiration for jobs in high up places. No, the education the children are receiving is based on facts and nothing solely. This kind of education does not prepare them for the real instauration it prepares them for a life of working in the drab factories of Coketown. deuce does not really encounter education for children in poverty in this book. daemons view on the education system and naturalises is that they are where any feeling of imagination and wonder are extracted from the children, and replaced by pure facts. This makes us ponder the hesitation did Charles Dickens believe that an education was to be void of all f acts, or did he believe that fact mixed with fiction was the correct room to educate children? Dickens shows his opinions very cl primordial end-to-end the book.The repetition of the word facts all byout the book, the elbow room it is said and how the facts are being demesne deeper and deeper into the childrens minds, shows us his dislike to this system. Louisa is a victim of the education system. This is quite ironic, visual perception as her father is the very man trying to enforce facts upon her and her classmates. Being an imaginative, creative child, interested in the circus, colour and liberal arts she micturates caught in the web of facts and struggles to escape. We see her licking towards her father and society as a whole grow and develop end-to-end each part of the book.Dickens makes the ratifier question Gradgrinds method of education and education and lets the reader decide if it is duty or wrong by the testify Dickens dullly reveals during the course of th e book. Charles Dickens creates a character whose teaching methods are quite different from the education system these days. Dickens has created a character, which is disliked by many, both in attitude and appearance. Gradgrind is exposit to be strong. Square wall of a forehead Dickens has used this imaging so the reader perceives Gradgrind as a very dull and square character.Dickens has described Gradgrind as a square man as it forces you to hazard a man with boundaries, and four straight walls with compare sides, nothing more nothing less. In this commission he portrays Gradgrind as a formal man, which helps you with the motion-picture show that he is a man of facts. Each chapter is cleverly titled. They relegate us insight into Dickens view of the events taking place in that special chapter. Murdering the desolates is an example of Dickens putting his view into the titles. This is a clear indication that he thinks the planting of facts and the lack of imagination elus ive is not good and is not right.He thinks this is essentially killing the children, who are innocent because they have thoughts which are pure, and these pure thoughts allow in imagination. The fact that this innocence is being taken away from them and they are turning into adolescents subject matter that they are entering a world of dishonesty, fault and failure. Dickens also portrays the characters full-strength traits through their name calling. Mr. Gradgrind and Mr. MChoakumchild are both examples of this. We can tell by the fitting of the characters that they are both strong and close to likely intimidating or cruel.Gradgrind implies the gradual grinding of facts into the childrens heads. Dickens uses these names as imagery. From Mr. MChoakumchild we overtly imagine the choking of a child. This gives us the impression that he does not like children and that he chokes them of their imagination. It makes you believe that he would not consent to them to have their own tho ughts of creativity but stick to facts and facts alone. I think Dickens has done this to inform the reader early on that these characters are not in the right and to hopefully give us the same impression of this education system as him.Certain pupils get enured differently to others in Coketowns school. It appears that how well you are treated in the school depends on your social status. unmanlike Jupe is confused with the circus she is rather looked down upon by the teachers because of this. She is referred to as girl number 20, whereas mortal from a better background may be called by his or her real name. Her relationship with Louisa later on in the story also tells a statement of its own about class and how people are treated. Bitzer is treated with respect at heart the education system because he is of high class, although not much higher than that of Sissy Jupe.He is quick to answer questions in class with straight facts, and this delights the teachers. His knowledge of facts and the fact he is from a wealthier family determines his status and measurement of respect he is given by teachers and students alike. Because of this division between the two characters we see them progress throughout the book observation how they both change and develop downstairs the same system. Bitzer follows and abides by the rules of facts, with his pale countenance and his eagerness to please.He is a teachers pet and is eager to realize and get in their good books- not ashamed to suck up to get where he wants to be. He is a very eager boy, and his pale appearance and walloping eyes give him a unconnected owlish appearance. In contrast Louisa rebels is a small but healthy, normal flavour child, rebelling against the rules, longing for freedom and wishing to use her imagination and explore fantasy. In demonstration I think that Dickens has written the book Hard Times in such a way that the reader empathises and understands the hardship of an education based pur ely on facts.He has written the book in such a way that you bind with his opinions on the system and you agree with his dislike of the education system. He makes you dislike the system, but not in an obvious way and he does it subtly throughout the book so that you agree with him all the way through. He uses subtle descriptions and techniques, which make the reader agree with his opinions. The way he uses chapter titles and characters names, the way Sissy and Louisa struggle through the system all add to your discretion of Dickens views.From the beginning of the book coin bank the end, Louisa shows signs of wanting to explore the unknown, fantasy and fiction, but because of the current education system and her father being at the head of it, Louisa struggles to do this. Louisa finds that she cannot suppress her imagination whilst maintaining the rules of the system, and as she grows up she finds it easier to stand up to her father. Throughout the book, Louisa does anything to ple ase her brother because of the factor of male assurance she will try and get him out of trouble and help him as much as she can.In a way she almost sees him as an older brother, or someone to look out for, who may in turn look out for her. At the end, she finally becomes loose of the shackles and facts that are binding her and can express herself imaginatively and creatively. Thomas Gradgrind Louisa both have fantastically opposite opinions. They grow together throughout the book and although Gradgrind is the main enforcer of facts, his daughter Louisa opens his eyes to the fact that imagination, creativity and fantasy are to be embraced in the education system, and not abolished from the minds of the young.